Relationship between Teachers’
Perception of Total Quality Management and Their Level of Organizational Commitment
1.0 BACKGROUND OF STUDY
1.1 TQM in Education
In order to
improve educational quality, highly developed countries have constantly
implemented educational changes. The
quality philosophy and principles have become central to international
educational reform efforts in nations such as Canada, Australia, Japan, the
United States and the
United Kingdom (Weller, 1996) as cited
in (Idris,
2009). The attraction of TQM philosophy is mainly because of its
successful record in the world of business in producing quality products and
services. In fact, TQM provides a structured and comprehensive delivery system
which may lead improvements in education (Weller and Hartley, 1994) as cited in
(Idris, 2009).
In Malaysia, in order to
build a world-class education system the Ministry of Education (MOE) had
started introducing the TQM in 1995. In 1995 the MOE had launched the ISO 9000.
A "customer charter" had been launched by MOE on April 1, 1996. The
Ministry formed a policy and quality section to monitor the education policy at
all levels based on the TQM principles. Within 6 months of the launching of the
customer charter, the National Higher Education Council was established in
September, 1996 to monitor standards in the government HEIs and a "grading
system" was laid down to assess the effectiveness of each academic
department and its faculty. In the basic education, primary and secondary
schools, the implementation of TQM had been introduced and implemented as well.
After two decades of the implementation of TQM in schools, several scientific
studies had been done to examine the success of TQM of the extent to which
quality management (QM) has been effectively implemented in schools. The
features of QM improvement implemented in secondary and primary schools include
values and duties, system and teams, resources and changes and meeting pupil
needs and empowering staff.
No comments:
Post a Comment